SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14266

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
BIJU.P.V – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.RAJESH SUKUMARAN
For the Respondents: SR.PP.SMT.SEETHA S

C.S.DIAS, J.

----------------------------------------

Crl. M.C No. 923 of 2026 -----------------------------------------

Dated this the 24th day of February, 2026

ORDER

The petitioner is the registered owner of a goods vehicle bearing registration no. KL-21-C-6644. The vehicle was seized by the Chakarakallu Police Station in Crime No. 754/2025, alleging that the vehicle was used for committing the offences punishable under Section

271 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (‘ BNS ’, in short).

2. The petitioner filed an application under Section 497 of the BNSS before the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate – III, Kannur, (‘learned Magistrate’, in short) seeking interim custody of the vehicle. However, by Annexure 3 order, the learned Magistrate dismissed the application on the ground that the vehicle was used to dump toilet and sewage waste in public water bodies. Subsequently, petitioner filed a fresh application for an identical relief, which has also been dismissed by the learned Magistrate as per Annexure A4. Annexures A3 and A4 orders, are erroneous and unsustainable in law. Hence, the Crl.M.C.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Pros

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top