IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
AMAL SAADHU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
ORDER
The petitioners are accused Nos. 1 and 2 in C.C.No.
962/2023 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Punalur (‘Trial Court’, for short), which has originated from Crime No. 1003/2023 registered by the Thenmala Police Station, Kollam District, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 294 (b), 323 and 341 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code .
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the respondents 2 and 3, who have executed Annexures A3 and A4 affidavits, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned counsel for the respondents 2 and 3.
4. The learned counsel on either side submits that, with the intervention of relatives and well-wishers, the parties have resolved their disputes amicably. The party respondents have no subsisting grievance and do not
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.