Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
MUHAMMED SHAMMAS U.M – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner invokes inherent jurisdiction to quash proceedings due to amicable settlement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsel from both sides confirm the absence of grievance. (Para 3) |
| 3. court observes non-serious nature of offences and necessity for settlement. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS TUESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2026 / 5TH PHALGUNA, 1947 CRL.MC NO. 1241 OF 2026 CRIME NO.699/2025 OF Chandera Police Station, Kasargod AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CP NO.80 OF 2025 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -I,HOSDRUG PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
MUHAMMED SHAMMAS U.M, AGED 19 YEARS S/O. ABDUL AZEEZ U.M, SHAHABAS MANZIL, KAVUNTHALA, PADANA VILLAGE, KASARGOD., PIN - 671312 BY ADVS.
SRI.P.K.SUBHASH SMT.JENI JOHN RESPONDENTS/STATE AND DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:
1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031
2 MUHAMMED SIYAF, REP. BY HIS FATHER SAKKARIYA A.C AGED 15 YEARS S/O. SAKKARIYA A.C, VADAKKE KOLAYATH HOUSE, PADNE P.O, HOSDURG, KASARGOD., PIN - 671312 BY ADV SMT.SREELAKSHMI SABU OTHER PRESENT:
SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR- SMT.SEETHA S THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE H
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
