SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14286

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
AKSHAY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.H.NUJUMUDEEN
For the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

ORDER

The petitioner is the third accused in C.C. No.

112/2019 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kolenchery (‘Trial Court’, for short), which has originated from Crime No. 175/2018 registered by the Ramamangalam Police Station, Ernakulam, for allegedly committing the offences under Section 406 and 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code .

2. The petitioner has stated in the Criminal Miscellaneous Case that he was represented through a lawyer before the Trial Court. However, due to the illness of the petitioner’s mother, the petitioner could not appear before the Trial Court. Subsequently, the petitioner went to Maharashtra in connection with his employment. Consequently, the petitioner has reliably learnt that a non-bailable warrant has been issued against him. The petitioner is willing to surrender before the Trial Court. However, the petitioner is apprehensive that the bail applications may not be considered on the same day, and he may be remanded to the judicial custody. Hence, the Crl.M.C.

3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. On a consideration of the facts and the material

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top