SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14294

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
MONISH. M,S/O. MOHANAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.SHAJIN S.HAMEED
For the Respondents: SRI.M.P.PRASANATH

O R D E R

The Criminal Miscellaneous Case is filed to quash Annexures B and C orders passed by the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class-V (Special Court-Marklist cases), Thiruvananthapuram, rejecting the petitioner's application seeking interim custody of his autorickshaw bearing registration No.KL-21-L-4028 under Section 451 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.).

2. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that the accused in the crime had pleaded guilty to the offences alleged against him. Consequently, the accused was convicted and sentenced to pay a fine. Accordingly, the case against the accused has been closed. Therefore, the petitioner's remedy is under Section 452 of the Cr.P.C.

3. I find the above submission to be tenable.

In light of the above submission, notwithstanding Annexures B and C orders, I dispose of this Crl.M.C. by permitting the petitioner to file a fresh application under Section 452 of the Cr.P.C. before the jurisdictional court. If such an application is filed, the jurisdictional court is directed to consider and dispose of the same, in accordance with law.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top