SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14323

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
LUKOSE M LUKE – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KOTTAYAM – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.A.SALINI LAL, SRI.R.SUNIL KUMAR, SHRI.JINU P. BINU
For the Respondents: SMT.G.SHEEBA-GP, SRI.ABEL TOM BENNY, SC.

JUDGMENT

1. The grievance of the Petitioner is that Ext.P2 Application dated

23.05.2024 submitted by the Respondent No.3 - Oil Marketing Company to the Respondent No.1 seeking a No Objection Certificate under Rule 144 of the Petroleum Rules , 2002, to enable the Petitioner to establish a Petroleum Retail Outlet is still pending. The Petitioner has now received Ext.P3 Notice from the Respondent No.3, alleging that the Petitioner has not made sufficient progress as per the letter of indent issued by the Respondent No.3. The Petitioner could not proceed with the establishment of the outlet on account of the non-issuance of NOC by the Respondent No.1. The Respondent No.1 is to be directed to dispose of Ext.P2 Application emergently.

2. In the light of the aforesaid submissions, I dispose of this Writ Petition, directing the Respondent No.1 to dispose of Ext.P2 Application within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM JUDGE mus APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 7125 OF 2026 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE OFFER LETTER ISSUED BY THE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top