SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14328

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
KANDATHIL MATHEW MATHEW – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 3478 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.T.MADHU, SMT.C.R.SARADAMANI, SHRI.J.PRAKASH C.VADAKKAN, SHRI.RENJISH S. MENON, SMT.AVANTHIKA R., SMT.ARUNIMA A.R., SHRI.T.S.DAVIS
For the Respondents: SHRI.SUJITH MATHEW JOSE, SC, PALA MUNICIPALITY, SMT. DEVI SHRI R., GP.

Procedural directions for correction of official records concerning personal information based on statutory mandates are a judicial necessity to uphold justice.

Headnote:The writ petition seeks the issuance of a mandamus for correction of the petitioner’s date of birth on official records as per the procedures in place. The court directed the relevant authority to process the application in accordance with law within a specified timeframe. The principal demand is for rectification of birth records to facilitate justice, supported by evidentiary documents. The court noted the respondents' statement regarding online applications and emphasized a time-bound resolution for the petitioner’s request.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's need for birth date correction. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court's directive for timely handling of application. (Para 3)
3. finalization of judgement and disposal of writ petition. (Para 4)

J U D G M E N T

The writ petition is filed with the following prayers; “(i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order directing the fifth respondent to permit the petitioner to apply for correction of his date of birth by providing the requisite facility in the online platform provided for submitting applications before the

5th respondent, so as to secure the ends of justice.

(ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order directing the fifth respondent to conduct enquiries on the application and to correct the date of birth of the petitioner as 16.04.1980 instead of 18.04.1979, as expeditiously as possible and within a time frame fixed by this Honourable Court, so as to secure the ends of justice.

(iii) This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of the English translation of Malayalam documents produced in the writ petition, so as to secure the ends of justice. And (iv)Such other relief’s as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”

2. This Court had passed the following order on 13.02.2026;

“The learned counsel for the respondents submits that it will be open to the petitioner to make an online application. This is recorded. Petitioner shall make an online application and produce a copy of the same before this Court.”

3. Thereafter, the petitioner filed I. A No.01 of 2026, producing a copy of the application for correction of date of birth, submitted before the 5th respondent.

4. In view of the above, there will be a direction to the 5th respondent to pass orders on the application, in accordance with law and with notice to the petitioner. Orders shall be passed, as directed above, within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

SD/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top