Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
PATHUMMA – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 7100 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for timing revision filed. (Para 1) |
| 2. non-objection to direction for consideration. (Para 2) |
| 3. direction to pass orders on application. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court seeking an expeditious disposal of Ext.P1 application filed by the petitioner for revision of her own timings concerning the vehicle bearing registration No.KL 73/C 3434.
2. The learned Government Pleader submits that there is no objection to a direction being issued to the respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P1, in accordance with the law and after hearing all affected parties, within two months.
3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader and having regard to the limited nature of relief sought for, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent/competent authority to consider and pass orders on Ext.P1, in accordance with the law and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and all affected parties, within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
The Writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
