Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
HASEENA BEEGAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge of a fitness certificate related to a blacklisted vehicle. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. issuance of an interim order to prevent vehicle idleness. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. allegations of fraudulent transfer of vehicle registration. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. court's stance on pending investigations affecting relief. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. continuance of blacklisting contingent on investigation outcome. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT
W.P.(C) No.22206 of 2025 :- The petitioner challenges Ext.P4 passed by the Additional Registering Authority, Aluva, declining to issue a fitness certificate on account of the vehicle being blacklisted, pursuant to a complaint made by the 4th respondent.
2. An interim order was passed by this Court on
17.12.2025, which reads as follows:-
“In the interest of justice and to prevent the vehicle from being kept idle, there shall be an interim order directing the 2nd respondent in WPC No. 22206 of 2025, to consider Ext.P3 submitted by the petitioner therein, for the issuance of a fitness certificate in respect of the vehicle bearing Registration No. KL-43-F-8314 with notice to the petitioner and the 4th respondent. Orders shall be passed on Ext.P3 application within one
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
