SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14347

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. KRISHNA KUMAR, J
M.K.CHANDRAN – Appellant
Versus
SUDARMA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:P.M.JOSHI| For the Respondents: C.DILIP, R.PRADEEP

JUDGMENT

The challenge in this petition mainly pertains to Ext.P9 order passed by the Sub Court, Muvattupuzha in I.A. No. 1302/2019 in C.M.A. No. 28/2018. By the said order, the court directed the petitioner herein to remove the obstructions in the plaint E schedule property, viz., the portion of a tomb projecting into the pathway and the firewood kept therein, within a period of 45 days.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the respondents.

3. During the course of hearing, both sides submitted that the original petition can be disposed of by directing the trial court to take evidence in the suit and to dispose of it on merits. It was also sought that permission be granted to both sides to amend the pleadings, if found necessary.

In the light of the above submission, the original petition is disposed of as follows:

(a) It is clarified that the implementation of Ext.P9 order will be subject to the final outcome in the suit.

(b) If the parties take steps for amending their pleadings, the court shall consider it in the light of the subsequent events.

(c) The trial of the suit shall be commenced at the earliest.

Sd/-

P.KRISHNA KUMAR, JUDGE dlk/24/2/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top