Non-prosecution of a case leads to its dismissal owing to the petitioner's absence.

Headnote:This judgment concerns the dismissal of OP

(C) No. 1340 of 2018 due to the petitioner's failure to provide representation. The court noted absences on both previous and current dates and determined that the petition could not proceed. The court concludes that non-prosecution warrants dismissal of the original petition.

JUDGMENT

When the matter was taken up on 08.01.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner. Today also there is no representation. Hence, the original petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14348

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP. KRISHNA KUMAR, JV.C. CHARLY – AppellantVersusANIL PAUL @ SHIBU – RespondentOP(C) NO. 1340 OF 2018

Non-prosecution of a case leads to its dismissal owing to the petitioner's absence.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. KRISHNA KUMAR, J
V.C. CHARLY – Appellant
Versus
ANIL PAUL @ SHIBU – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 1340 OF 2018