Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14349

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. KRISHNA KUMAR, J
MADHUSUDHANAN KUMBAMVILA ROADARIKATHU VEEDU, KOTTAMAM CHENKAL VILLAGE, PARASUVAIKKAL P.O. – Appellant
Versus
LAL.K.LAKSHMAN LAL SREE VEEDU, KOTTAMAM, PARSUVAIKAL VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT 695 508. – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 1837 OF 2019

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.B.KRISHNA MANI
For the Respondents: SRI.ARUN V.G., SRI.NEERAJ NARAYAN

The court dismissed the original petition due to it being deemed infructuous, following the counsel's submission.

Headnote:This judgment primarily addresses OP

(C) No. 1837 of 2019, whereby the court considered the petitioner's counsel's submission regarding the matter's infructuous nature. The court determined that, due to the stated reasons, the original petition should be dismissed in the interest of justice. Consequently, the original petition is dismissed as infructuous.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, the original petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

P.KRISHNA KUMAR, JUDGE dlk/24/2/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :