SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14350

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. KRISHNA KUMAR, J
REMESAN – Appellant
Versus
DAVOOD – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.PROMODH KUMAR, SRI.K.B.SAJEESH, SMT.MAYA CHANDRAN, SRI.AADITYA NAIR
For the Respondents: SRI.S.VINOD BHAT, SHRI.K.A.SHAJI MATHEW, KUM.ANAGHA LAKSHMY RAMAN

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties. Hence, the original petition is closed.

Sd/-

P.KRISHNA KUMAR, JUDGE dlk/24/2/

APPENDIX OF OP(C) NO. 2050 OF 2018 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT O.S.NO.266/2016 DATED

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top