SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14354

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. KRISHNA KUMAR, J
REGHU – Appellant
Versus
NEELAKANDAN NAMBOOTHIRIPAD – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 2381 OF 2017



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.B.JAYASANKER
For the Respondents: SHRI.V.P.EASANAN NAMBOODIRIPAD, SHRI.GEORGE VARGHESE KIZHAKKAMBALAM

Lack of representation by petitioners resulted in dismissal for non-prosecution, highlighting the importance of active participation in legal proceedings.

Headnote:In OP

(C) No. 2381 of 2017, the High Court assessed the dismissal of the petitioners' case for non-prosecution due to their absence during hearings. The Court emphasized the necessity of representation in legal proceedings and reiterated that lack of participation leads to dismissal of cases under procedural rules. The judicial observation concluded with the verdict endorsing dismissal of the petition. The original petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

JUDGMENT

When the matter was taken up on 08.01.2026, there was no representation for the petitioners. Today also there is no representation. Hence, the original petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top