Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14364

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
MURALI MOHAN K – Appellant
Versus
VIBHUSHANAN – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 307 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.11769 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.FARHANA K.H., SHRI.MUHASIN K.M.
For the Respondents: VIDYA KURIAKOSE SR.GP

Compliance with judicial directives is essential to avoid contempt of court.

Headnote:The court considered the compliance of directions issued in the judgment dated 25.03.2025 in WP

(C) No.11769 of 2025. It recognized that the Government Pleader affirmed compliance, leading to the closure of the contempt case. The decision highlights adherence to prior judicial directives.

JUDGMENT

Today, when the matter came up for consideration, the Government Pleader submitted that the directions in the judgment dated 25.03.2025 in WP (C) No.11769 of 2025 have already been complied. If that is the case, no further direction is necessary.

Recording the submission of the Government Pleader, this Contempt Case (C) is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14364

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JMURALI MOHAN K – AppellantVersusVIBHUSHANAN – RespondentCON.CASE(C) NO. 307 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.11769 OF 2025

Compliance with judicial directives is essential to avoid contempt of court.

Headnote:The court considered the compliance of directions issued in the judgment dated 25.03.2025 in WP(C) No.11769 of 2025. It recognized that the Government Pleader affirmed compliance, leading to the closure of the contempt case. The decision highlights adherence to prior judicial directives.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
MURALI MOHAN K – Appellant
Versus
VIBHUSHANAN – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 307 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.11769 OF 2025

Headnote:The court considered the compliance of directions issued in the judgment dated 25.03.2025 in WP

(C) No.11769 of 2025. It recognized that the Government Pleader affirmed compliance, leading to the closure of the contempt case. The decision highlights adherence to prior judicial directives.