IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
HEMALATHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This Writ Petition (C) is filed seeking the following reliefs:
" (i) issue a writ of mandamus or such other writ, direction or order compelling the 2nd respondent to consider Exhibit.P2 application, affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a time frame to be fixed by this Honourable Court ; (ii) issue such other writ, direction or order as is deemed just and necessary in the facts, features and circumstances of the case.
(iii) pleased to dispense with the translation of documents produced in vernacular language."
[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P2 Form – 5 application within a time frame.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P2 application within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 4th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P2 application to the 3rd respondent/Authorised O expeditiously as pos
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.