IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
HARIKRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6564 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks mandamus for application consideration. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's counsel satisfied with a timely direction. (Para 3) |
| 3. court directs proper timeframe for processing application. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
This Writ Petition (C) is filed seeking the following reliefs:
" (i) issue a writ of mandamus or such other writ, direction or order compelling the 2nd respondent to consider Exhibit.P2 application, affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a time frame to be fixed by this Honourable Court ;
(ii) issue such other writ, direction or order as is deemed just and necessary in the facts, features and circumstances of the case.
(iii) pleased to dispense with the translation of documents produced in vernacular language."
[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P2 Form – 5 application within a time frame.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P2 application within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 4th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P2 application to the 2nd respondent/Authorised O expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
2. The 2nd respondent/Authorised O to consider Ext.P4 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 4th respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the report.
3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 2nd and 4th respondents for compliance.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE SSG
APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 6564 OF 2026 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE DATA BANK IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONER’S PROPERTY Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE FORM 5 APPLICATION DATED
Judgment reserved
NA
Date of judgment
24.02.2026
Judgment dictated
24.02.2026
Draft Judgment Placed
25.02.2026
Final Judgment Uploaded 27.02.2026
16-7-2025 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 16-7-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.