IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SANIDA C.V – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with the following prayers:
i. call for the records relating to Exhibit P-2, P-4 and P-6 and set aside the originals of the same by the issue of a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ or order.
ii.declare that the Petitioner is legally entitled to get approval of her appointment in view of the non- availability of protected teachers and compliance with all statutory requirements including submission of declaration .
iii. issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ order or direction commanding the Respondents to grant approval to the appointment of the Petitioner covered by Exhibit P-1 with all consequential service and monetary benefits.
iv.issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ order or direction commanding the 1st Respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P-9 Revision Petition within a time frame after hearing the Petitioner.
v. to dispense with filing of English translation of vernacular documents produced in the Writ Petition.
vi.pass such other order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper to grant in the circumstances of the case.”
[SIC]
2. When this writ petition came up for consider
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.