SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14383

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
BIJU P.M – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COLLECTOR (RR) – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6865 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.JUNAID.V.S, SMT.ANNS MARY JOSEPH
For the Respondents: SMT.VIDYA KURIAKOSE SR.GP

The court mandates timely consideration of administrative applications by government authorities to ensure justice is served.

Headnote:(i) The petitioner seeks a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to consider an application expeditiously. (ii) The Court orders consideration of the application within specified time frames based on the 4th respondent's report. (iii) The petitioner is required to submit certified copies for compliance.

Table of Content
1. seeking relief through writ of mandamus. (Para 1)
2. petitioner seeks consideration of an application. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court orders consideration within specific time frames. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

This Writ Petition (C) is filed seeking the following reliefs:

" (i) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other writ, order or direction directing the 1st respondent to consider and dispose Exhibit P3 application within such time fixed by this Honorable Court, in the interest of justice;

(ii) To dispense with the production of English translation of Malayalam Exhibits produced along with the Writ Petition in the interest of justice;

(iii) Issue any other writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the circumstances of the case."

[SIC]

2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P3 Form – 5 application within a time frame.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P3 application within a time frame.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:

1. The 4th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P3 application to the 1st respondent/Authorised O expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2. The 1st respondent/Authorised O to consider Ext.P3 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 4th respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the report.

3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 1st and 4th respondents for compliance.

Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE SSG

Judgment reserved NA
Date of judgment 24.02.2026
Judgment dictated 24.02.2026
Draft Judgment Placed 25.02.2026
Final Judgment Uploaded 26.02.2026
APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 6865 OF 2026 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE NO.89950891 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 05.12.2024 Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT NO.KL11014604983/2024 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED

10.05.2024 Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION NO.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top