Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ST JOSEPH CLAY WORKS PIRAROOR, VENGOOR, KALADY, ERNAKULAM – Appellant
Versus
THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LA) – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6884 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for relief on property data entry consideration. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. submission of petitions by petitioner counsel. (Para 3) |
| 3. direction for timely action on petitions. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
This Writ Petition (C) is filed seeking the following reliefs:
" i) Issue a of writ of mandamus or appropriate direction to the 1st respondent to consider the Ext.P2 to P5 application of the petitioner and remove the entry of petitioner’s property from data Bank within a time frame fixed by this Hon’ble court.
ii) Dispense with filing of the translation of documents in Malayalam produced in the above writ petition.
iii) Pass such other writs, orders or directions as this Hon'ble Court may deems just, fit and necessary in the facts and circumstances of this case.
iv) Allow the writ petition writ petition with cost." [SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Exts.P2 to P5 Form – 5 applications within a time frame.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Exts.P2 to P5 applications within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 3rd respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Exts.P2 to P5 applications to the 1st respondent/Authorised Officer, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
2. The 1st respondent/Authorised O to consider Exts.P2 to P5 applications (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 3rd respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the report.
3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 1st and 3rd respondents for compliance.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE SSG
APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 6884 OF 2026 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPTS OF PROPERTY IN SURVEY NO. 33/13, 33/14, 33/15, 33/9, 33/6, 33/10,33/3,33/4, 33/5, 33/2,46/5,46/14, 33/8, 46/6, 33/1, 33/7, 46/15, 46/8 ISSUED BY THE MATTUR VILLAGE OFFICER FOR THE YEAR 2025-2026 IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE FORM 5 APPLICATION FOR THE PROPERTY OF 36.31 ARES IN SY.NO 33/10, 33/2, 33/3-2, 33/4, 33/5 PREFERRED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT ON 12.02.2024 AFTER REMITTING THE FEES OF RS. 100/-
Judgment reserved
NA
Date of judgment
24.02.2026
Judgment dictated
24.02.2026
Draft Judgment Placed
25.02.2026
Final Judgment Uploaded 27.02.2026
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE FORM 5 APPLICATION FOR THE PROPERTY OF 50.32 ARES IN SY.NO 33/1, 33/8, 46/14,46/5,46/6 PREFERRED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT ON 13.02.2024 AFTER REMITTING THE FEES OF RS. 100/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
