SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14393

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SAJINA BABURAJAN – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COLLECTOR (RR) – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6949 OF 2026



Timely consideration of applications by administrative authorities is mandated by law to ensure justice.

Headnote:The petition seeks a Writ of Mandamus for the consideration of Exhibit.P3 application. The contention raised by the petitioner emphasizes the need for timely action. The court directed a report submission to the first respondent within one month and consideration of the application within four months. The ruling establishes procedural timelines to enhance administrative efficiency.

Table of Content
1. court mandates timely action on applications. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)

JUDGMENT

This Writ Petition (C) is filed seeking the following reliefs:

" (i) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other writ, order or direction directing the 1st respondent to consider and dispose Exhibit.P3 application within such time fixed by this Honorable Court, in the interest of justice;

(ii) To dispense with the production of English translation of Malayalam Exhibits produced along with the Writ Petition in the interest of justice;

(iii) Issue any other writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the circumstances of the case."

[SIC]

2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P3 Form – 5 application within a time frame.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P3 application within a time frame.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:

1. The 4th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P3 application to the 1st respondent/Authorised O expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2. The 1st respondent/Authorised O to consider Ext.P3 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 4th respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the report.

3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 1st and 4th respondents for compliance.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top