SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14394

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
RADHAKRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOZHIKODE – Respondent


JUDGMENT

This Writ Petition (C) is filed seeking the following reliefs:

" i. issue of Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ in the like nature direction or order commanding the 1st Respondent to pass orders, after hearing the petitioner on Exhibit P-3 application of the Petitioner made in Form 5 under “ Act 28/2008 ” within a time frame that may be set by this Honorable Court;

ii. dispense with filing of the translation of vernacular documents;

iii. pass such other orders deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and that may be prayed hereafter."

[SIC]

2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P3 Form – 5 application within a time frame.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P3 application within a time frame.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:

1. The 3rd respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P3 application to the 1st respondent/Aut

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top