SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14398

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ABDUL BASHEER V – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO.7033 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: sri.vijai mathews, shri.joseph thekekuruvanal, smt.fathima rinshi
For the Respondents: smt.vidya kuriakose, sr. gp, smt.deepa v, gp

Timeliness in administrative processes concerning statutory applications under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act.

Headnote:The Writ Petition is filed under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus for expeditious disposal of Ext.P1 application. The Court directed the 6th respondent to submit a report within one month and the 3rd respondent to consider the application within four months thereafter for compliance with the law. The final outcome determines the timely conduct of administrative procedures and assesses compliance with statutory requirements.

Table of Content
1. filing and purpose of writ petition. (Para 1 , 2)
2. hearing representation of counsels. (Para 3)
3. judicial directions on administrative action. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:

"i. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, directing the 3rd, 5th and 6th respondents to conduct expeditious inquiry and to dispose of Exhibit P1 Application, within a time limit to be specified by this honourable court.

ii. Pass an order to dispense with the filing of the translation of vernacular documents produced in the above case.

iii. Grant any other Writ, Order, or direction as deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. "

[SIC]

2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P1 Form-6 application filed by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P1 within a time frame.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:

1. The 6th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext. P1 application to the 3rd respondent/Authorised Officer within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2. The 3rd respondent/Authorised O to consider the Ext.P1 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 6th respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the report. I make it clear that the 3rd respondent is free to pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law.

3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 3rd and 6th respondents for compliance.

Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE hks

Judgment reserved NA
Date of judgment 24.02.2026
Judgment dictated 24.02.2026
Draft Judgment Placed 25.02.2026
Final Judgment Uploaded 27.02.2026
APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO.7033 OF 2026 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION IN FORM NO 6 BEARING NO.28/2025/529744 DATED 30-01-

2026 EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 04-02-2026

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top