IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
PRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO.7036 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the petitioner's application under the act must be considered promptly. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the court emphasizes the urgency of timely action from the administrative body. (Para 3 , 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i) Issue a of writ of mandamus or appropriate direction to the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P4 application which is filed in Form 6 as per the Kerala Conservation and Paddy Land and Wet Land Rules, and allow the same within a shortest time frame fixed by this Hon’ble court.
ii) Permit the petitioner to produce the English translation of the Exhibits in Vernacular languages as and when directed the Hon’ble Court iii) Pass such other orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances.
And iv) Allow this Writ Petition with costs. "
[SIC]
2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P4 Form - 6 application filed by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P4 within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 4th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext. P4 application to the 2nd respondent/Authorised Officer within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
2. The 2nd respondent/Authorised O directed to consider the Ext.P4 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 4th respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the report. I make it clear that the 2nd respondent is free to pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law.
3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 2nd and 4th respondents for compliance.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE hks
APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO.7036 OF 2026 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED DATED
Judgment reserved
N/A
Date of Judgment
24.02.2026
Judgment dictated
24.02.2026
Draft judgment placed
25.02.2026
Final Judgment uploaded
27.02.2026
27.4.2007 BEARING NO. 2665/I/2007 IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER, EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED
21.5.2025 ISSUED FOR THE YEAR 2025-2026 IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER, EXHIBIT P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 27.05.2025 ISSUED IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER, EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE FORM 6 APPLICATION DATED
29.1.2026, SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER, BEFORE THE 2 ND RESPONDENT
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.