IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
M M SKARIACHAN – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
WP(C) NO.7045 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court mandates compliance with specific timelines. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court supports timely processing of applications. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i) Call for the records relating to Exhibit P3 application and issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P3 application at the earliest.
ii) Dispense with filing of the translation of vernacular documents all Exhibits documents, in the above writ petition iii) Such other orders, directions and reliefs as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper to grant."
[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext. P3 Form–5 application within a time frame.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P3 application within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 4th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext. P3 application to the 2nd respondent/Authorised Officer, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
2. The 2nd respondent/Authorised O directed to consider Ext. P3 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 4th respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the report.
3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 2nd and 4th respondents for compliance.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JUDGE hks Judgment reserved NA
Date of Judgment 24.02.2026
Judgment dictated 24.02.2026
Draft Judgment placed 25.02.2026
Final Judgment uploaded 27.02.2026
APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO.7045 OF 2026 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE TAX PAID RECEIPT OF THE ABOVE PROPERTY DATED 15.09.2025 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF DRAFT DATA BANK ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.