IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SULAIMAN POTTAMMAL – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO.7088 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition to expedite application consideration. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsel hears both sides arguments. (Para 3) |
| 3. court mandates report and action timeline. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"a) To issue a Writ of mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or order or direction commanding the 2nd Respondent /authorized officer to take up Ext-P2 application submitted by the Petitioner, consider it and pass appropriate orders on the same within a short span of time as this Hon'ble Court thinks fit in the interest of justice.
b) To pass such other appropriate orders or directions as this Hon’ble Court deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.
c) Dispense with filing of the translation of vernacular documents. "
[SIC]
2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P2 Form - 6 application filed by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P2 within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 3rd respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext. P2 application to the 2nd respondent/Authorised Officer within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
2. The 2nd respondent/Authorised O directed to consider the Ext.P2 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 3rd respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the report. I make it clear that the 2nd respondent is free to pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law.
3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 2nd and 3rd respondents for compliance.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE hks
APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO.7088 OF 2026 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT NO.KL10071207172/2025 DATED 23/05/2025 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF FORM.6 APPLICATION NO.20/2022/439020 DATED 30/01/2023 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT/
Judgment reserved
NA
Date of judgment
24.02.2026
Judgment dictated
24.02.2026
Draft Judgment Placed
26.02.2026
Final Judgment Uploaded
27.02.2026
AUTHORIZED OFFICER EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION STATUS AVAILABLE IN THE WEBSITE OF KERALA REVENUE DEPARTMENT
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.