Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14408

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ABDUL KHADER C – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO.7093 OF 2026

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.JAMSHEED HAFIZ, SMT.T.S.SREEKUTTY, SMT.FATHIMA NASREEN S.
For the Respondents: SMT.VIDYA KURIAKOSE, SR. GP, SMT.DEEPA V, GP

Court cannot mandate consideration of applications pending since petitioner can re-approach if delays occur.

Headnote:The petition pertains to a Form-5 Application lodged on 13.02.2026, with court deliberations indicating that mandamus cannot be issued to consider said application at this stage. The petitioner is permitted to seek relief again if undue delay occurs (paragraph 2). The court's primary findings underscore the procedural context of delays and options available for recourse (paragraph 2). Ultimately, the court disposes of the writ petition with the stated observations.

Table of Content
1. writ petition regarding form-5 application. (Para 1)
2. petitioner can re-approach if delay occurs. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

This Writ Petition (C) is filed to consider a Form-5 Application filed on 13.02.2026.

2. The Writ Petition is filed on 23.02.2026. I am of the considered opinion that, in such a situation this Court cannot issue mandamus to consider Form-5 Application. The petitioner can wait and if there is any unnecessary delay in disposing the Form-5 Application, the petitioner is free to approach this Court again.

With the above observation the writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14408

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JABDUL KHADER C – AppellantVersusTHE STATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(C) NO.7093 OF 2026

Court cannot mandate consideration of applications pending since petitioner can re-approach if delays occur.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ABDUL KHADER C – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO.7093 OF 2026