SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14411

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
KABEER.K.H – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 7099 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.K.P.RAJEEVAN
For the Respondents: SHRI.DEEPU THANKAN, SC, KSRTC, SRI.AKHIL SURESH,SC

A court can mandate administrative actions to ensure timely consideration of welfare requests by employees, especially for health-related accommodations.

Headnote:Writ Petition filed seeking a mandamus to direct the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation to consider extension of light duty due to the petitioner's chronic eczema. The Court directed consideration of the request within three weeks while allowing the petitioner to continue in the previously assigned lighter duties. The merits of the petition are not adjudicated upon at this stage.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks consideration for lighter duties due to chronic health condition. (Para 2)
2. counsels for both sides presented their arguments. (Para 3)
3. court instructs timely administrative review and permits continued lighter duties. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:

"i) Call for the records leading to this case and issue a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Exhibit P6 and post the Petitioner as a Store Issuer in the Regional Workshop, Aluva exempting him from performing the duty of a mechanic.

ii) Issue such other orders as this Hon’ble court may deem fit to issue in the fact of this case.

iii) Dispense with filing of the translation of vernacular documents. "

[SIC]

2. The petitioner is a Mechanic in the Regional Workshop, Aluva of the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation (in short KSRTC). According to the petitioner, as evidenced in Exts.P1and P5 Medical Certificates, the petitioner is suffering from chronic eczema and not in a position to perform duty of a mechanic having contact with petrol/ diesel. He was granted light duty for six months as seen in Ext.P4, is the submission. His illness is not completely cured, is the further submission. Therefore, the petitioner submitted Ext.P6 for extension of the period with Ext.P5 Medical Certificate. The same is not considered is the grievance of the petitioner. Now the period mentioned in Ext.P4 will expire on 28.02.2026. Hence, this writ petition.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.

4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P6, within a time frame. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:

(i) The 1st respondent is directed to consider Ext.P6 taking into consideration Ext.P5, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

(ii) Till then the petitioner shall be allowed to continue in the duty as ordered in Ext.P4.

(iii) I make it clear that I have not considered the matter on merit, and the 1st respondent is free to pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law, If necessary, after getting Medical Board opinion.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top