IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
JAYAKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE GURUVAYUR MUNCIPALITY – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with the following prayers:
“I. Issue a writ of Mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd Respondents to grant to assign building number of the petitioner in the light of Exhibit P6 Judgment and to quash the Exhibit P5 in the interest of justice.
II. Any other writ or order that this Honorable Court deems fit.” (SIC)
2. When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be allowed to file a fresh application for numbering the building. The Standing Counsel for the Municipality submitted that the application is already rejected as per Ext.P5. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be allowed to file an application after curing the defect.
3. If that be the case, I think, the petitioner can be allowed to file a fresh application for numbering the building and there can be a direction to consider the same, in accordance with law. I make it clear that, I have not considered the matter on merit and the respondents are free to pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of with the following directions:
1. The petitioner is free to file a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.