IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
RITTY MARTIN – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF THIRUVANATHAPURAM – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i) a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order quashing the Trade license issued to the 2nd Respondent as evidenced by Ext P-6.
ii) a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order directing the 1st Respondent Corporation to revoke the trade license issued to the 2nd Respondent as provided under Section 492 (9) of the Kerala Municipalities Act .
iii) any other appropriate writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court may be deem fit and necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, and allow this petition with all costs."
[SIC]
2. Petitioner is the land lord of the property which is in the possession of the 2nd respondent. According to the petitioner, the lease period is over, and therefore the petitioner submitted an application to the Corporation authorities to cancel the license issued, because the consent given by the petitioner was over. The same was rejected by the Corporation. Aggrieved by the same, this Writ Petition is filed.
3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Corporation and the learned counsel
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.