Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: N.KRISHNA RAJA MAULI
For the Respondents: K JANARDHANA SHENOY GP

The court dismissed the writ petition due to the petitioner's decision not to pursue it further.

Headnote:This judgment follows WP

(C) NO. 23864 OF 2017 concerning the dismissal of a writ petition by the petitioner K.P.JOSE. The court addresses the fact that the petition is not pressed and concludes with the dismissal. The court notes the representation of respondents and the dissatisfaction expressed by the petitioner.

JUDGMENT

When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition is not pressed.

Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :