Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14444

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SURENDRAN M.C – Appellant
Versus
KAPPUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 35931 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.DEEPAK MOHAN
For the Respondents: SMT.DEEPA NARAYANAN, SHRI.K.SUJAI SATHIAN, SMT.PREETHI. P.V., SMT.MARY LIYA SABU, SMT.AISWARYA S. ASHOKAN, SHRI.NEERAJ KRISHNA KUMAR, SHRI.ARAVIND K.

Writ petitions may be dismissed as infructuous if the prayers become irrelevant.

Headnote:The court analyzed the merits of the writ petition regarding the prayers submitted by the petitioner, concluding that they were infructuous. The court framed the issue of whether the prayers could be adjudicated upon, ultimately determining that the petition was no longer relevant. Resultantly, the writ petition was dismissed.

JUDGMENT

The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayers in this writ petition are infructuous.

Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14444

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JSURENDRAN M.C – AppellantVersusKAPPUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT – RespondentWP(C) NO. 35931 OF 2025

Writ petitions may be dismissed as infructuous if the prayers become irrelevant.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SURENDRAN M.C – Appellant
Versus
KAPPUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 35931 OF 2025