IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
KUNJAMMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the 2nd Respondent to correct the name of the father of the 2nd Petitioner in his birth certificate (Exhibit P1) by substituting the name of the 3rd Respondent as the biological and lawful father of the 2nd Petitioner, based on Exhibit P2 DNA Report and Exhibit P3 Agreement;
ii. Direct the 1st Respondent to issue necessary instructions to the 2nd Respondent to make the needed correction in Exhibit P1 within reasonable timeframe.
iii. Pass such other orders or directions as this Hon’ble Court may deem just, fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. "
[SIC]
2. The 1st petitioner is the mother of the 2nd petitioner-minor child. According to the 1st petitioner, the 3rd respondent is the father of the 2nd petitioner. But, the father of the 2nd petitioner is wrongly stated in the Birth Certi petitioners want to correct the same. Hence, this writ petition.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent.
4. The petitioners submitted that, they are read
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.