IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
DIVYA.V.R. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with the following prayers:
(a)“Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the 5th respondent to consider Exhibit P7 purchase notice issued by the petitioner;
(b)Direct the 4th respondent Secretary to reconsider the application for the building permit dehors the Master plan if the 5th respondent Municipal Council not resolved to acquire the property within the statutory period of 60 days from the date of issuance of Ext.P7 notice;
(c)Direct the 4th respondent to consider the building permit application submitted by the petitioner in the light of Exhibit P8 judgment of this Hon’ble Court;
(d)Dispense with the production of translation of vernacular documents;
(e) Issue such other writ, order, or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
[SIC]
2. The petitioner submitted an application for a building permit, as evidenced by Ext.P3. The same was not considered on the ground that the property is included in the Sanctioned Master Plan. In such circumstances, the petitioner submitted Ext.P7 purchase notice on 12-09-2025. There has been no response from the Municipality. Hence, in the light
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.