SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14456

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
S. RAJASEKHARAN NAIR – Appellant
Versus
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 46830 OF 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.BIJIMON, SMT.BINDU B., SRI.JACOB SAMUEL, SHRI.ABRAHAM JOSEPH
For the Respondents: SHRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY, SC, CORPORATION, SHRI.K.S.FRIJO, SMT.BINCY JOSE (K/341/2015), SRI.ARAVIND AJITH, SMT.P.B.MALINI RAO, SMT.FADIYA FARZA V.A.

A writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous if the relief sought is no longer of relevance.

Headnote:The High Court of Kerala, in WP

(C) No. 46830 of 2024, held that the petitioner's prayers have become infructuous as noted by the learned counsel. The court, therefore, dismissed the writ petition accordingly, based on the submissions made by the petitioner.

JUDGMENT

When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayers in this case are infructuous.

Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top