SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14457

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S. MANU, J
SATHIDEVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
LA.APP. NO. 40 OF 2024 | LA.APP. NO. 137 OF 2025 | LA.APP. NO. 143 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.PRATHEESH.P, SMT.ANJANA KANNATH, SMT.MARIYA JOSE, SMT.JOSHNA JOY, SMT.SAFNA P.S.
For the Respondents: ADV REKHA C NAIR, SR.GP

The appellants are entitled to land value enhancement based on fixed prevailing rates from similar cases due to lack of challenges from the respondents.

Headnote:The matter addresses the appeals concerning inadequate compensation for land acquired under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act. The court found that the appellants are entitled to enhancement of land value based on fixed values in identical cases, specifically referencing the recent ruling in L.A.R No.176 of 2000. The appeals were disposed of, fixing the land value at Rs.75,000/- per Are. Ultimately, all statutory benefits were granted to the appellants but with a stipulation on interest regarding delays.

Table of Content
1. land acquisition notification and inadequate compensation. (Para 1)
2. arguments concerning fixed land value based on precedents. (Para 2)
3. court's observation linking current cases to previous judgments. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

Properties of the appellants were acquired pursuant to a notification issued under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act published on 26.03.1996, for formation of Kollam Bye-pass. Aggrieved by the inadequate compensation granted by the Land Acquisition Officer references were sought. The reference court by a common judgment disposed the references. Dissatisfied with the enhancement granted by the reference court the appellants approached this Court in L.A.A Nos.722, 495 ad 597 of 2012. The appeals were disposed by a common judgment dated 06.06.2019, by a learned Single Judge. The learned Single Judge set aside the impugned judgments and decrees and remitted the matters for fresh consideration. Thereafter, the reference court passed the judgments impugned in these appeals. The reference court found the issues in favour of the appellants and held that they are entitled to proportionate enhancement of land value on the basis of land value fixed in L.A.R No.325 of 2000 together with all statutory benefits. However, the land value was not fixed by the reference court. Therefore, the appellants against approached this Court in these appeals.

2. When the appeals were taken up for hearing the learned Counsel for the appellants submitted that for properties falling within the same category the reference court recently re- fixed the land value at Rs.75,000/- per Are. He pointed out that the respondents have not challenged the said judgment so far and therefore the value fixed by reference court in L.A.R No.176 of 2000 and identical cases has become final. He therefore prayed that the same value may be granted in these appeals also. 3. The learned Senior Government Pleader submitted that the properties involved in these appeals and L.A.R No.176 of 2000 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Kollam are identical. She also submitted that the State has not filed any appeal against the judgment in L.A.R No.176 of 2000 .

4. As the State has not challenged the land value fixed by the reference court in L.A.R No.176 of 2000 and the properties involved in these appeals and that was involved in L.A.R No.176 of 2000 fall within the same category, I am of the view that these appeals can be disposed of by fixing the land value at Rs.75,000/- per Are.

Hence the appeals are disposed of, fixing the land value of the properties involved at Rs.75,000/- per Are. The appellants shall be entitled for all statutory benefits. In view of the orders passed in the applications for condonation of delay in these appeals, the appellants shall not be entitled for interest for the period of delay.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top