JUDGMENT

When these appeals were taken up for hearing the learned Counsel for the appellant brought to my notice the judgment of this Court in L.A.A No.723 of 2012 dated 06.06.2019. He submitted that the dispute arising in these cases is also pertaining to the nature and character of the property acquired and appropriate compensation to be granted. In the judgment pointed out by the learned Counsel for the appellant this Court held that evidence on record was not sufficient to arrive at a conclusive finding regarding the nature as well as comparability of the properties involved. Therefore, this Court found that the proper course would be to remit the matter to the reference court for permitting the parties to adduce fresh evidence and to decide the matter on the basis of the same. The reference court thereafter considered the matters afresh. The learned Sub Judge in L.A.R No.176 of 2000 re-fixed the land value at Rs.75,000/- per Are. The property involved in the said land acquisition reference was also included in category No.V – land interiorly situated. The properties involved in these cases are also in category No.V. The learned Senior Government Pleader submitted that no app