Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14464

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
A HAMZA – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE – Respondent
OP (CAT) NO. 135 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.MOLTY MAJEED, SHRI.C.A.MAJEED, SHRI.K.H.ASIF, SHRI.P.B.UNNIKRISHNAN NAIR, SMT.SHERIN BIJU
For the Respondents: SHRI.T.C.KRISHNA, SRI.T.V.JAYAKUMAR NAMBOODIRI

A case rendered infructuous due to lack of relevance leads to dismissal.

Headnote:The court addressed the case of A Hamza against the Secretary of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare regarding an appeal that was deemed infructuous. The petitioner submitted that the case no longer held relevance, resulting in the court dismissing the case as infructuous.

Result: 'Accordingly, the same is dismissed as infructuous.'

Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this case is rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the same is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14464

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMSUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJA HAMZA – AppellantVersusTHE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE – RespondentOP (CAT) NO. 135 OF 2025

A case rendered infructuous due to lack of relevance leads to dismissal.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
A HAMZA – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE – Respondent
OP (CAT) NO. 135 OF 2025