IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
SABU VARGHESE – Appellant
Versus
SUDHA SASIKUMAR – Respondent
SRI RILGIN V GEORGE SRI SUNIL KUMAR KURIAKOSE GP THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
24.02.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, &
P.V.BALAKRISHNAN,JJ.
-------------------------------------
R.P.No. 1338 of 2025 in WA No.1868 of 2025 ---------------------------------
Dated this the 24th day of February 2026
O R D E R
P.V.BALAKRISHNAN,J This review petition is filed by the appellants in W.A.No.1868/2025, seeking review of the judgment dated
4.8.2025, passed in it.
2. Heard Adv.K.V.Gopinathan Nair, the learned counsel for the review petitioners, Adv. Rilgin.V.George, the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent and Adv.Sunil Kumar Kuriakose, the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents 2 and
3.
3. It is to be seen that the judgment in W.A.No.1868/2025 was passed by this Court on merits, after considering the materials on record and hearing both sides in detail. A perusal of the grounds raised in this review petition would clearly show that what the review petitioners now seek is a rehearing of the writ appeal on merits, on the ground that the statutory provisions have been wrongly interpreted by this Court. I
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.