SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14473

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R. RAVI, J
LAKSHMI P.U – Appellant
Versus
KALADHARAN K.P – Respondent
TR.P(C) NO. 790 OF 2025 | OP NO.111 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.T.M.RAMAN KARTHA, SMT.MANJULA NAIR, SMT.REVATHY M.A., SMT.GOWRY GOPINATH

The court allows the transfer of case due to lack of objection from the respondent, providing grounds for judicial efficiency.

Headnote:This transfer petition under section X (quote relevant section) has been filed seeking transfer of O.P.No.111/2025 pending before the Family Court, Neyyattinkara to the Family Court, North Paravur. The court notes that the respondent has been duly served with notice but has not appeared, indicating no objection to the transfer. Consequently, the petition is allowed. The final decision is that O.P.No.111/2025 is transferred as requested.

ORDER

This transfer petition has been filed seeking transfer of O.P.No.111/2025 pending before the Family Court, Neyyattinkara to the Family Court, North Paravur. Even though the respondent has been served with notice, he has not chosen to appear. Apparently the respondent has no objection to the prayer in the transfer petition.

In the above circumstances, this transfer petition is allowed. O.P.No.111/2025 pending before the Family Court, Neyyattinkara stands transferred to the Family Court, North Paravur.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top