IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
N.K. CHELLAMMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 24th day of February, 2026 Above writ petition is filed seeking to quash Exts.P4 and P6, wherein proceedings were initiated by the respondent Panchayat to remove encroachment into the property of the Panchayat.
2. When the matter came up for consideration on
19.11.2025, this Court directed the petitioner to submit a representation before the 2nd respondent and directed the 2nd respondent to take a decision on the matter, taking into consideration the submission made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been running the milma booth for almost 35 years.
3. The learned Counsel for the 2nd respondent submits that a decision has been taken, and submits that the request cannot be considered since there is no vacant place available to accommodate the petitioner.
In view of the above, nothing survives in this writ petition, and accordingly the same is closed. It is made clear that the disposal of the writ petition will not stand in the way of the petitioner making necessary request before the additional 4th respondent for a suitable accommodation, and if filed, the same shall be considered and disposed of by the additional 4th respondent in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.