JUDGMENT

Petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by the unauthorised parking of autorickshaws in front of his property and seeking a direction to the respondents to take steps to remove the same. 2. When the matter came up for consideration on

25.08.2022, this Court has passed an interim order directing respondents 2 and 3 to ensure that no autorickshaws are parked in front of the petitioner’s residential house obstructing the vicinity towards the road.

3. In the counter affidavit by respondents 2 to 4, especially in paragraph 4, it is stated that the said respondents have not allowed any autorickshaw parking area in front of the petitioner’s property and also that the said area is a busy commercial area. In the counter affidavit filed by the 10^th respondent, their contention is that they are not parking autorickshaws obstructing to the entry of vehicles to the property of the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for the 10^th respondent would further submit that they have no intention to park any autorickshaws in front of the property of the petitioner obstructing his ingress and egress and vicinity towards the public road. The said submission is recorded.

4. Admittedly, this