Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14499

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, J
DEEPAK GEORGE CHARLES – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 5770 OF 2026

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT. AMMU ABRAHAM, SHRI.KARJET KODUVATH, SMT.KOCHUMOL KODUVATH
For the Respondents: SRI.AJIT JOY

The court permits withdrawal of a writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one.

Headnote:The case concerns the withdrawal of a writ petition. The petitioners sought permission to withdraw their writ petition, which was granted by the court. The court's findings confirmed the withdrawal and allowed the petitioners to file a fresh petition. The main issue revolved around the petitioners' request to withdraw and the resulting court order. The final decision recorded was: 'the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh writ petition.'

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition.

The said submission is recorded, and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh writ petition.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14499

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMSHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, JDEEPAK GEORGE CHARLES – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 5770 OF 2026

The court permits withdrawal of a writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, J
DEEPAK GEORGE CHARLES – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 5770 OF 2026