Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. SOUMEN SEN, CJ, MR. SYAM KUMAR V.M., J
MOOSAKUTTY T. – Appellant
Versus
ABDUL SALEEM – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. eviction sought under rent control act based on specific grounds. (Para 1) |
| 2. court affirmed findings of previous courts related to bonafide landlord needs. (Para 2) |
| 3. arguments against landlord's claim considered but found insufficient. (Para 4) |
| 4. concurrence of facts established a valid eviction requirement. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. revision petition disposed with time granted for vacancy. (Para 8) |
This Rent Control Revision is filed challenging the judgment of the Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thalassery, in R.C.A. No.70/2024, which arises from the order of the Munsiff Court, Kuthuparamba, in R.C.P. No. 39/2021. The R.C.P. had been filed by the landlord seeking eviction under Section 11 (2) and (3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act , 1965. A claim for enhancing the rent has also been raised therein. The Rent Control Court had, vide order dated 30.03.2024, allowed the R.C.P. holding that the arrears of rent as under (2) had been outstanding and that, a case had been made out for directing eviction on the ground of non payment of arrears of rent. Further, as regards Section
11(3), it was concluded that the bonafide need of the landlord had been valid
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
