RAJI,W/O ASHOKAN vs AUTHORIZED OFFICER, (UNDER SARFFEASI ACT), THE PAYYOLI CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14517

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
RAJI,W/O ASHOKAN – Appellant
Versus
AUTHORIZED OFFICER, (UNDER SARFFEASI ACT), THE PAYYOLI CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.E.SAJAL, SHRI.P.ABDUL JALEEL, SHRI.MUHAMMED HISHAM T., SMT.FATHIMA RINSHA T.P.
For the Respondents: SRI.M.VIVEK RABINDRANATH

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 23^rd day of February, 2026 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition is not pressed.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14517

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBASANT BALAJI, JRAJI,W/O ASHOKAN – AppellantVersusAUTHORIZED OFFICER, (UNDER SARFFEASI ACT), THE PAYYOLI CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD – Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
RAJI,W/O ASHOKAN – Appellant
Versus
AUTHORIZED OFFICER, (UNDER SARFFEASI ACT), THE PAYYOLI CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD – Respondent