SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14531

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. Jayachandran, J
R Ebrahim Shaheed – Appellant
Versus
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palakkad – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6601 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri Jacob Sebastian, Smt. Shamseera C. Ashraf, Shri Winston K.V, Smt. Anu Jacob, Smt. Anjana Krishnan, Shri Vincent C. J
For the Respondents: Adv. Deepa Narayanan–Senior Government Pleader

A petitioner can pursue an application for land title under the Kerala Land Tax Act without needing to fulfill additional requirements under Act 28 of 2008.

Headnote:This case involves the interpretation of Section 6A of the Kerala Land Tax Act and discussions regarding compliance with Act 28 of 2008. The petitioner claimed title over specific land previously used for commercial purposes and sought action on his application. The court directed the second respondent to consider the application without insisting on an order under Section 27A.

Table of Content
1. petitioner claims land title under specific sections. (Para 1)
2. court confirms the need for respondent to comply with application. (Para 2)
3. writ petition disposed with directives for compliance. (Para 3)

J U D G M E N T

Dated this the 23rd day of February, 2026 Petitioner claims title to 0.1592 hectares of land in re-survey nos. 89 and 148 of Palakkad-I Village. The whole plot is occupied by a commercial building, which was constructed 50 years back and assessed by the local authority. The property has been reclaimed prior to the introduction of Act 28 of 2008 . When the petitioner submitted Ext.P13 application before the 2nd respondent in terms of Section 6A of the Kerala Land Tax Act in Form No.A, the 2nd respondent maintains that the petitioner has to take recourse to the remedy under Act 28 of 2008 . Learned counsel would submit that there is no legal necessity for the same. The issue is covered by Ext.P14 judgment of this Court, and also, by a Division Bench judgment of this Court in State of Kerala v. Shaji N.T.

[2025 KHC Online 1118], is the submission.

2. In respect of the above-referred legal position, learned Senior Government Pleader has no quarrel.

3. In the circumstances, there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider petitioner's application under Section 6A produced at Ext.P13, in accordance with law, without insisting for an Order under Section 27A of Act 28 of 2008 , expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment before the

2nd respondent, for compliance.

The Writ Petition (Civil) will stand disposed of, as above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top