SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14535

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
RIFAN NAUSHAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.SIDHARTH P.
For the Respondents: SMT.D.LEEMA ROSY

ORDER

Dated this the 23rd day of February, 2026 The petitioners 1 to 4 involved in Crime No.443/2023 of Kannamali police station, filed this Crl.M.C. under Section 528 of BNSS , praying for quashing all further proceedings against them. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Sections 304-B & 306 of IPC .

2. The prosecution case is that the 1st accused married the daughter of the defacto complainant who was studying in Australia on 30.10.2022 while they were living there as husband and wife, the accused persons threatened to abandoned her in Australia, appropriated more than Rs.10 lakhs from her account and another Rs.3 lakhs sent by the defacto complainant and subjected her to cruelty both physically and mentally and as a result of which she committed suicide on 03.01.2023.

3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, it is a false case foisted against the petitioners. Moreover, according to him, now the entire dispute between the petitioners and the defacto complainant has been settled. Therefore, he prayed for quashing all further proceedings against the petitioners.

4. The learned counsel for the 2nd respondent/defacto complainant also submitted tha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top