SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14546

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
K.LIJESH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 41079 OF 2016



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.V.A.MUHAMMED, SRI.M.SAJJAD
For the Respondents: GOVERNMENT PLEADER G.SHEEBA GP

Court mandates fresh consideration of teachers' appointments if no protected teachers are available, aligning with past rulings.

Headnote:{'statute_analysis': 'Under G.O.(P) No.10/10/G.Edn dated 12.01.2010, the approval of appointments of teachers hinges on the availability of protected teachers.', 'facts': 'The Petitioners, teachers appointed on 01.06.2010, faced the rejection of their appointment approval leading to the filing of this Writ Petition to challenge the Ext.P6 Order.', 'findings_of_court': "The Court found that the previous order ignored the Petitioners' claims regarding the lack of available protected teachers and directed a fresh consideration.", 'issues': "The central issue revolves around whether the absence of protected teachers in the relevant cadre impacts the legitimacy of the Petitioners' appointment.", 'ratio_decidendi': 'Citing the precedent in Moosakutty Puthuvalappan v. District Educational Officer, the Court emphasized that approval is necessary in cases where no protected teachers are available.', 'result': 'Hence, I dispose of this Writ Petition, setting aside the Ext.P6 Order, and directing the Respondent No.1 to consider the matter afresh.'}

Table of Content
1. approval of teachers' appointments requires consideration of available protected teachers. (Para 1 , 2)
2. previous order did not account for necessary evidence related to protected teachers. (Para 3)
3. directs fresh assessment of teacher appointments. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 23rd day of February, 2026

1. The Petitioners are the teachers of the School of the Respondent No.5 as HSA (Maths) and HSA (English) who were appointed on 01.06.2010. Since approval of their appointment was rejected, they submitted a Representation before the Respondent No.1 and the same was rejected by Ext.P6 Order holding that the Manager did not appoint protected teachers in view of G.O.(P) No.10/10/G.Edn dated 12.01.2010. This Writ Petition is filed challenging the Ext.P6 Order.

2. The contention of the learned Counsel for the Petitioners is that the Petitioners had raised a specific contention before the Respondent No.1 that no protected teachers in the cadre of HSA (Maths) and HSA (English) were available in Malappuram District for appointing them by the Manager and Ext.P6 Order was passed without considering the said contention. In view of the decision of this Court in Moosakutty Puthuvalappan v. District Educational Officer, Wandoor and Others [ 2009 (3) KHC 446 ], the appointment of teachers made in the additional vacancies is to be approved in the absence of any protected teacher in the educational sub-district.

3. On going through the Ext.P6 Order, it is seen that the Petitioners had raised a contention that no protected teachers were available in the cadre of HSA (Maths) and HSA (English) in Malappuram. The Respondent No.1 rejected the claim of the Petitioners without ascertaining whether protected teachers were available in the cadre of HSA (Maths) and HSA (English) in Malappuram District.

4. Hence, I dispose of this Writ Petition, setting aside the Ext.P6 Order, and directing the Respondent No.1 to consider the matter afresh within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment in the light of the decision of this Court in Moosakutty Puthuvalappan (Supra), after ascertaining whether the protected teachers in the cadre of HSA (Maths) and HSA (English) were available in Malappuram District for the year 2010-2011.

Sd/-

M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top