IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
DR. ABDU RAHMAN.K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :
i) “Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writs, orders of directions calling for the records leading to Exhibit P9 and P10 and quash the same;
ii) Issue a writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to award the designation of Medical officers along with the eligible financial benefit in retrospective effect.
iii) Issue a writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to award adequate compensation for the sufferings due to the violation of fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution of India.
iv) Dispense with the filing of English translation of Vernacular documents;
v) Grant such other reliefs as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case
2. The impugned order is passed admittedly based on the direction in Ext.P5. Ext.P5 is a judgment in OP(KAT) No. 68/2025 which was filed challenging an order passed in OA No. 2286/2023 of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram. Hence, if the petitioners are aggrieved by the order passed based on Ext.P5, the petitioners have to go back to the Administrative Tribunal with appropriate Original Application. This Court
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.