JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed with following prayers:

i. Call for the records relating to Exts.P1 to P6, P8 and P9 from the respondents.

ii. Quash Exts.P2 and P9 by the issue of a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ direction or order.

iii. Issue a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents not to demolish the petitioner's building covered by Exts.P4 and P5 on the basis of Ext.P2 and P9 or otherwise.

iv. Such other reliefs which in the circumstances of this case, this Honourable Court deems just and proper.

(SIC)

2. This writ petition is filed challenging Exts.P2 and P9 orders passed by the Corporation. Ext.P2 is a provisional order under Section 406 (1) of the Kerala Municipality Act and Ext.P9 is the confirmation order. The petitioner earlier approached this Court with WP(C) No. 38285/2015 challenging the provisional order. This Court disposed that case as per Ext.P7 judgment. It will be better to extract the judgment itself: “The petitioner has filed Ext.P6 objection to Ext. P2 provisional order passed in terms of (1) of the . The petitioner questions the very jurisdiction of respondents 3 and

4 to issue a provisional order of the nature.

2. I make it clear that even